Sunday, July 31, 2016

Excerpts from Wilson’s Odyssey and the Joy of S.T.E.M.

The following are excerpts from my book, Wilson’s Odyssey and the Joy of S.T.E.M. , now for sale at Lulu.com  Comments are most welcome. When commenting on a particular excerpt, please consider starting your comment with the title of that excerpt.

The Buzzers

 “Well, one of my responsibilities involved a product that had been in production for years. It had never been a problem, so I hadn’t bothered even to look at the design. Suddenly there was a problem and it was mine to fix. It had always been free of problems, so Production had assembled 600 units before doing any testing. Then on acceptance testing, every unit they tested failed.
“It was a simple circuit; a wheatstone bridge drove a sensitive relay, which, in turn, drove a slave relay. The input was one leg of the bridge and the output was the set of slave relay contacts. When the input signal was raised to a certain level, the sensitive relay contacts closed and energized the slave relay. The contacts of the slave relay then lit a lamp. The circuit was dead simple; small wonder there hadnt been a problem.
“But now there was. When the slave relay closed, it did with such force that it sent a shock through the chassis that re-opened the sensitive relay. That, of course, re-opened the slave. In time, the sensitive relay re-closed, causing the slave to re-close and the process started all over again. This all happened so fast the units became buzzers. Turns out the slave relay guy had “improved“ it.
“The bosses came up with a number of possible fixes. Add a vibration isolator to the sensitive relay or the slave or both. Now were talking big development and testing. And no assurance any of these ideas would work. It looked like we would need a new design, the 600 units would have to be scrapped. Wed salvage only the relays. And, of course, our customer would not be happy with the delay in delivery.
“So I studied the buzzer action, and it occurred to me that since the slave relay coil was inductive, it might hold enough current long enough to stay closed until the sensitive relay re-closed, if there were an alternate path for that current. Then I thought, hey, put a diode across the slave coil. I got lucky. I put a small, axial-lead diode across the slave relay coil, and that was all it took to get all 600 units to work okay. No redesign. No scrapping. No disappointed customer.

Inductance and Capacitance

“I’ll be working just with power circuits, and they use only three types of components: inductors, capacitors and switches. An inductor is like a mass; the same equations apply. David, you took high school physics. Remember f = ma, force equals mass times acceleration?” Bob got up and found a pad and pencil. As he talked he began writing equations. “Look, the equation for inductance is

e = L di/dt

voltage equals inductance times the rate change in current. Same thing.”
“Why do they use ‘e’ for voltage, why not ‘v?’” asked Linda.
“Picky, picky, picky,” said Bob. “Actually a good question ‘cause in the old days they called voltage ‘electromotive force’ or ‘emf’. They did think of voltage as a force.”
“How is ‘a’ like ‘di/dt?” asked David.
 Bob said “C’mon, acceleration is rate change in velocity, so f = m dv/dt, but here the ‘v’ is velocity, not voltage. So current is analogous to velocity.”
 “Linda, would you like to watch Ed Sullivan?” Ingrid asked.
“Seems like the time is right,” said Linda. Bob looked at his wristwatch.
Ingrid said, “No, Bob, Linda’s not talking clock time.” Ingrid, Linda and David laughed and after a bit, Bob’s serious demeanor collapsed and he joined in. The ladies left for the sofa to watch TV.
“So what’s the deal on capacitors?” asked David.
“For me, a capacitor is like a water tank. The equation is

v = (1/C) ∫ i dt.

You had integral calculus, right?”
“No.”
“Okay, no problem, we can write it in arithmetic form where the initial value of time is zero and current is constant.” He wrote:

v = it/C

“Here ‘v’ is the height of the water in the tank, which of course would give a force, ‘i’ is flow rate of water so ‘i t’ is the amount of water gone into the tank and ‘C’ is the cross-sectional area of the tank.”
“Makes sense,” said David.
“So I just deal with masses and water tanks,” Bob said. “The E.E. equations are just M.E. equations in disguise.” He paused. “But get this, if you’re defining something, shouldn’t you use equations where the left hand side is what you’re defining, like this?” He wrote:
L = v/(di/dt) C = i/(dv/dt)

“Here I put ‘C’ in differential form.  So now we can say inductance is the ratio of voltage across a device to the rate of change of current through it. And capacitance is the ratio of current through a device to the rate of change of voltage across it. Look at the symmetry here. Each is the switcheroo of the other. I’ve never seen those equations in a textbook or anywhere else; why, I don’t know.”
“Maybe you’re the first to come up with this.”
“No. Math types probably see this right away without having to write it out.”
“Nah, they would have written it out.” He called out, “Hey Ingrid, your husband’s a genius.”
“I know,” she said, “he told me.”
 David said, “Bob, one problem: you need a better word than ‘switcheroo.’”
“Okay, but what?”
 David said, “How about ‘transposition?
“Good, I like it.” Bob affected a professorial tone: “Inductance and capacitance are voltage-current transpositions of one another.”
“Sounds good to me,” said David. “Pompous, but good.”

A Regulated PWM Chopper without Feedback

 “Hey, listen, I got an idea for a regulated output PWM chopper without any feedback.”
           Felder smiled. “Regulated without feedback. This I got to see.”
        “Okay, remember how the first PWM control modules used a zener on the input to the ramp supply?”
         “Yeah, and they took a while to figure out you’re better off without it.”
        “Right,” said Wilson, “I pointed that out to them. A lot of guys must have. So anyway, without the zener, we get line regulation. You can do the same for load regulation.”
          Felder seemed skeptical. “How?”
        “Take the ramp feed from the input of the inductor but, and here’s the key, after its equivalent series resistance.”
          Felder looked incredulous for a moment and then burst out laughing. “And just how do propose to get to that point?”
          “Okay to mark up your schematic?”
          “In pencil, sure.”
Wilson drew another winding under the inductor, adding dots to the left side of each and connecting the two right ends together. He pointed to the open left end of the new winding. “Bingo.”
        Folding his arms, Felder rested his elbows on his desk and leaned forward. He studied what Wilson had drawn. After a while, he sat back. “ I’ll be darned. I would have sworn it couldn’t be done and it’s so simple. Did you try this?”
          “No, you’re the one working on a PWM. You should try it.”

The Cycloconverter

 A case in point: the cycloconverter, a finished unit returned by the customer. The unit worked okay in the lab, but at the customer’s facility, blew out silicon controlled rectifiers, or SCRs, as soon as the unit was turned on. Freeman assigned Wilson the task of getting it to work. The circuit was simple: a three-phase, 400Hz input was sampled so as to produce a single-phase 60Hz output. Others, Freeman was vague as to whom, had tried various fixes but to no avail. Wilson suspected spikes due to reverse recovery of SCRs to be the culprit. His analysis seemed counter intuitive; a larger input line inductance would cause less reverse recovery energy to be stored in that inductance. He soon realized such was the case. He wound three air-core inductors and put them in the input lines. The SCR transients were indeed reduced.
Wilson gave Freeman the good news. Janssen sat at his own desk across the room. “Let me get this straight,” said Freeman, “you reduced the energy in the line inductance by increasing the inductance?”
“Yes.” He went to the blackboard and began writing:

e = L di/dt
edt = Ldi

“The reverse recovery time of the SCR, dt, is pretty much fixed. True, it varies somewhat with reverse current, but as an approximation we can say it’s fixed. Now since e is fixed, edt is fixed, so Ldi is fixed. If we increase L, di decreases. So if we, say, double L, di goes in half and di-squared goes to one-quarter and the energy, one-half Ldi-squared, goes in half. Increase the L, and you reduce the reverse recovery energy in it.”
Freeman called Allard in and asked Wilson to repeat his analysis. “Of course!” said Allard. He laughed with delight. “Beautiful!”
Janssen frowned. “Why does our customer blow SCRs and we don’t?”
“The customer has a big machine with low line inductance, and our little lab machine’s got a much larger line inductance.”
“I took shots with and without the added inductors,” said Wilson. He handed the photos to Allard who scanned them and gave them to Freeman. He checked them and looked at Janssen with raised eyebrows.
Janssen didn’t respond, but said, “You’ve assumed a fixed reverse recovery time, like it’s all recombination. What if it’s predominantly swept charge?”
Wilson went back to the blackboard. “Let’s see. He drew x and y axes labeling them “t” and “i” and a ramp starting at the origin and terminating with a vertical line. He tapped the triangular area. “Here’s our stored charge. Now let’s double the inductance.” He made another ramp with half the slope extending beyond the first vertical line and ending with another vertical line. “For the same area and half the slope, the triangle must be longer by a factor of the square root of two and lower by a factor of the square root of two over two.”
Allard interrupted, “”Don’t you wish you had multiplied the inductance by four?”
Wilson laughed. “Right, but let’s press on. So now we get one-half the di-squared and with double the inductance we get no change in Ldi-squared. Adding inductance doesn’t help, but doesn’t hurt. So in the real world case, where you’ve got both recombination and swept charge, adding inductance helps but not as much as if there were no swept charge.”
“How do we know you added enough inductance?” Janssen asked. “We and “you is it? Noted.
“I stiffened our generator with ac caps, so at high frequencies, it was like a rock, and the added inductors did the job.”

Replacing a 6-Volt Battery with a 12-Volt Battery

Wilsons third SCCA event, his first race, not a drivers school, was in Vineland, New Jersey, 30 miles inland from Atlantic City.  He took Dave as his pit crew. Bob told Dave about the handling improvements he had made to the car: tires, shocks and camber. Dave said, “Did you ever think about going to a 12-volt system? You have to change light bulbs and headlights, but you can use a 12-volt transistor radio. They dont change the starter motor. Why I dont know, but they say the car starts better.
        “I thought about it but I decided it wasnt a good idea. The starter motor gets less current from the 12-volt battery than the 6.
         “Less? Doesnt twice the voltage give twice the current?
        “Not in this case. The starter motor winding has a resistance that matches the internal resistance of the battery, lets say 20 milliohms. Then the total resistance, battery plus motor, is 40 milliohms. That makes the current 150 amps. The 12-volt has twice as many cells and that alone means twice the resistance. And if the 12-volt battery is the same size, I mean the same volume, as the 6 volt, the cells must have one-half the area and that means the resistance is twice as much again, so the total resistance of the 12 volt battery is 4 times as much or 80 milliohms. So the total resistance, battery plus motor, is 100 milliohms. Now the current is 12 volts divided by100 milliohms or 120 amps. So going from a 6- volt battery to a 12-volt battery of the same size gives you 20 percent less current in the starter motor.
        “Sounds to me like youve gone through this before.
     “Yup. Its a matter of matching impedance, like with hi-fi speakers. You know how theyre marked, usually 8 ohms, sometimes 4 or 16 ohms? Thats so you can match them to the amplifier output impedance.
        “So why do some guys say the engine starts better with the 12-volt?
    “I dont know, maybe they get a hotter spark. Maybe theyve got dirty plugs, or wires, or distributor cap, so they need the higher voltage.

The Three-phase Class B Amplifier

 Well, at first I toyed with the idea of scrapping the SCR approach and going with a three-phase Class B amplifier.
Thats not very efficient.
Actually its not as bad as you might think. A Class B amplifier has an ideal efficiency of pi over four, 78.6 percent, not so good. But my analysis of a Class B emitter follower with a three-phase transformer load says the ideal efficiency is about 86 percent, not so bad.
Why would the efficiency be any better? Its still Class B.
Aha. If Im right, with an emitter follower output, only two phases conduct at a time. Transformer action makes a third phase that back-biases the third phase transistors and keeps them from conducting. It works like the vacuum tube amplifier that Fisher patented in World War II. “
What happened to that Fisher amplifier?
Transistors happened to it.  Transistors did away with all those big output transformers, and you need transformer taps to make the scheme work.
And with a three-phase load you dont need taps?
Right.”
So why didnt you use it?
I didnt know enough about squirrel-cage induction motors, whether or not the coupling among phases would be tight enough to make the scheme work. Besides, we had already bought into using SCRs. He paused. “If they were looking for low noise, we’d probably have gone Class B.”
“So the motor current would be sinusoidal and the battery current would have no ripple.”
“Ideally, yes,” said Wilson, “but the motor is not perfectly linear so you have a choice, make the motor current sinusoidal and allow a little ripple in the input dc or control it so the input dc is has no ripple and the motor current has some harmonics. The boat battery is a lot bigger than the motor so I guess you’d go for ripple-free input dc.”